From Crippled Child Magazine, June, 1942. EDITORIAL MIGRATORY FAMILIES The settlement laws which are in force in a number of our states at the present are hindering the prompt care of all handicapped children of migratory parents. In these instances the resident requirements of the laws must be fulfilled before the crippled child can be cared for. Dr. A. L. Van Horn at the Wilmington Conference emphasized the problems arising out of this situation and said that the Crippled Children Services were urging states at least to relax their requirements for residency. The National Society is also urging cooperation of its affiliated state societies for children with other agencies through Resolution No. VI passed at Wilmington Two years ago a study was made of the of settlement and migration by the State Department of Welfare of New York of which David C. Adie is Commissioner. He gives a summary of their findings in these words in an article in the current issue of Public Welfare News: Our settlment laws, perhaps once suitable to a states agricultural economy, are no longer useful and have no place in a modern dynamic industrial society. In the same article Mr. Adie pointed out that the number of migrant peoples who need help after they migrate is only a small part of the peoples. He furthermore shows that the administrative cost of the Back system between districts is all out of proportion to the small amounts exchanged, not to speak of the work involved. Rhode Island is one state which has recognized the true status of its settlement provisions and ncgated them in January of this year by passing the General Public Assistance Act which renders speedy aid to the needy irrespective of residence. We note in the same issue of Public Welfare News a statement to the effect that other groups are working to have settlement laws of other states repealed or at least suspended for duration bercause of the detrimental effect they have upon the migration necessary for war activities. Very significant also is the United State Supreme Courts decision against one of the old poor laws. In the case of Edwards vs. People of California the Court declared unconstitutional a law which bars a man from entering a state because he is indigent. We may hope, therefore, that prompt action may be effective in
respect to laws which hinder the intent of our people in the care
of physically handicapped children among the parents of migratory
families seeking employment and a place in the nations war effort. |